None. Almost all of them contain some illegal content when the rest absolutely contains it.

You can access clear net adult sites via tor but don’t expect the video to have smooth playback.

In most countries distribution of the copyright content is the illegal part not acquisition.

So people running those ring tones orgs in the early 2000s would be the one that gets chased not some bloke who has it as their ringtone.

Must be a regional thing. All the places I went to in Australia has no issues with covering music.

I doubt they can stop people from making covers but if they start selling them, that is when they get involved.

A local band playing something at the local pub is ok. While if the pub records it and sells it as “Long John Pub mix volume 1” I bet the lawyers would swoop in.

If something is objectively bad and you enjoy it, isn’t that just bad taste?

I have never understood the point of guilty pleasures. Why are you letting other people decide what you like?

That sure is a lot of acronyms…

Linux.

While a lot of things do work, some only work ok with vendors not really worrying about a 2% and growing user base.

There is a feature called Crosspost looks like 2 squares on top of each other.

You upload the pic to one community and Crosspost it any others.

As instances are community run it saves on storage costs.

Portainer for container images

Bash script for everything else.

deleted by creator

Depends.

The warehouse operator will claim it on Insurance so they are not out of pocket.
Insurance will sue the person who started the fire and can never pay off the debt so the debt will be written off after a decade of near to no payments and get a healthy tax deduction for it.

The only person to loose out will be the workers who are now out of a job, the tax payer who receives less taxes paid due to the write off and the loss of sales tax.

Most likely yes they would be as they would be owned by the person/org making the app, unless it is mentioned somewhere.

How do we know? We haven’t contacted them.

Because why go for native performance when you can go for minimum effort on all platforms.

And you feel qualified to limit what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home because???

One is owned by a US tech corp whose primary income stream is building advertising profiles on users and selling advertising space to businesses while handing data off to authoritarian governments without warrants.

The other is a US non profit where the FBI admitted the only data they can get from them is when the user registered and when they were last online.

Nothing wrong with it. It’s a choice by consenting adults

Not often. I browse by new all so I can begin the downvote train as early as possible and report stuff.

They aren’t doing anything new, we have already been around the moon.