Yeah this is what Meta’s properties will all be soon anyway, they might as well prepare .

Is it that fediverse chick that was sending me messages?

I’m guessing he can’t really do much of a chip per se. Sounds more like he can do only base components.

Still better than OpenAI, Google, and Facebook

I voted 3rd party for 20 years, but I stopped when Trump came to power. It’s not a 10% difference any more. It’s the difference between living in a free and democratic country and living in a fascist dictatorship.

I used to think this way in the '90s. But anyone today who can look at Trump and say he’s the same as the Dems is fucking delusional.

Whos the other one?

I always thought she looked kind of off. Now I know it’s the bleached skin.

Maybe. If it was a compelling case I’d think they’d show us the data.

I don’t think batteries will soak up that much salt for their use. And I’d imagine they saturate over time. It’s very different than something built specifically for deslination.

Not, for example, if it’s only producing 1l/day.

I mean if we are talking about lack of mental acuity, we are talking about most of MAGA, no? The rest being criminals and sociopaths/psychopaths?

Overall, the model predicts that almost 73% of respondents who missed all 10 questions would vote for Trump (remember, that is controlling for education and the other factors), while about 51% who were average on the exam are expected to vote for Trump. Only 35% of people who had a perfect score on the exam are predicted to be Trump supporters.

Notably, this very strong, significant effect of verbal ability can be identified within educational groups. While non-college whites certainly turned out more heavily for Trump, the smart ones did not — only 38% of those with perfect scores are expected to go for Trump, and only 46% of non-college graduates who scored a standard deviation above the mean. The same is true for college graduates — low cognition college graduates were more likely to vote for Trump. …

https://www.salon.com/2022/03/23/new-research-on-voters-theyre-not-the-sharpest-tools-in-the-box/

“Specifically, non-gifted men scored higher on conservatism than gifted men,” reports PsyPost. “The non-gifted men were more likely to endorse values related to tradition and strict social order. Gifted men were less likely to hold these traditional conservative views.”

https://www.alternet.org/republican-party-maga-men/

Um, maybe for a second to see if they are attractive or not, but that’s about it.

I mean no one finds people that they find unattractive attractive, man or woman, do they?

I can’t imagine it’s doing this at a rate that will make a big impact on water supply, I suspect this is one of those things they throw in just to have a good headline.

Yeah in Colorado it can be 60 degrees and sunny and snowing in the same day

So, a guy with a PHD thesis on solid state batteries is saying that these results are not as promised

I’m still happy to see his sales numbers dwindling. If he loses the consumer market, it will still be a big loss regardless what idiocy Wall Street gets up to.