See, the problem is, free news has to make revenue from somewhere.

If they aren’t taking subscriptions, then they are probably showing ads, so their content is at the mercy of their sponsors.

Even if they are taking subscriptions, they are probably showing ads. That makes it doubly bad.

The alternative is secondary sources (i.e. social media), where theres already a bias by whoever is curating it.

We are amidst an actual information war. Like, there are at least two totally separate realities existing on the US right now. A reliable source of news is important, and capitalism has destroyed all of the old outlets and left us skeptical of the new ones. Good job, everyone.

I know! It seemed totally plausible! There is a very odd discrepancy between that and the general population.

I’m glad that Linus clarified that it was High Resolution Timers. I was honestly thinking they were arguing about Hormone Replacement Therapy.